Auto-generated recap of a concluded election. Figures are the certified result. This article can be edited; edits are preserved and not overwritten by regeneration.
At a glance
| Winner | Runner-up | |
|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Jayden Petersen | Flowery Dreemurr |
| Party | F*** Egg Party | Liberal Socialist Party |
| Electoral vote | 279 | 184 |
| States carried | 31 | 19 |
| Popular vote | 76,500,119 (45.72%) | 52,346,620 (31.29%) |
Overview
Jayden Petersen of the F*** Egg Party (FEP) secured the presidency in 1992, capturing 279 electoral votes across 31 states to surpass the 270 threshold needed for victory. Petersen finished first in the national popular vote as well, earning 76,500,119 votes (45.72%) against a fractured opposition led by Liberal Socialist Party (LPS) nominee Flowery Dreemurr, who took 184 electoral votes and 52,346,620 votes (31.29%). Democratic Party nominee Bill Clinton placed third with 75 electoral votes and 38,065,408 votes (22.75%), while independent candidate Anthony Green drew 404,189 votes (0.24%) and zero electors.
How the Night Unfolded
The electoral-vote-over-time tracker depicts an intense contest where Petersen held an early advantage, withstood a mid-count drop, and ultimately locked down the map. At turn 99, Petersen led with 237 projected electors, ahead of Dreemurr's 193 and Clinton's 107. Petersen continued to gain ground over the next few updates, climbing to 256 at turn 101 and crossing the 270 threshold at turn 105 with 277 electoral votes as Clinton's tally shrank to 42.
The race tightened significantly around turn 118, when Petersen slipped back below the threshold to 256 electoral votes following a brief resurgence by Clinton to 96. Petersen quickly regained momentum, rising to 261 at turn 120 before crossing the winning line for good at turn 122 with 282 electoral votes. While late shifts trimmed Petersen's tally to 279 at turn 128 and edged Dreemurr up to 183 at turn 147, Petersen held firm at 279 through the final count to seal the election.
Notable Races
The election featured razor-thin margins in several key battlegrounds alongside massive regional blowouts. New Hampshire proved to be the closest contest on the board, where Dreemurr edged out the field by just 0.11% (34.26% winning share) to claim 4 electoral votes. Petersen claimed narrow victories in Arizona, taking its 8 electoral votes by 1.33% with 48.61% of the vote, and Missouri, winning 11 electoral votes by 1.69% with 47.86%. Dreemurr also survived a tight challenge in Indiana, carrying its 12 electoral votes with a 2.25% margin. Petersen secured Ohio's 21 electoral votes by a similarly slim 2.30% margin and took West Virginia's 5 electoral votes by 2.40%.
In contrast, both Petersen and Dreemurr commanded overwhelming margins in their core territory. Petersen's safest states were Oklahoma (87.32% share, +81.14% margin) and Utah (87.24% share, +80.53% margin), alongside lopsided wins in Florida (87.30%, +80.50%) and Texas (85.60%, +77.50%). Dreemurr scored an enormous win in Minnesota, pulling 89.91% of the vote for an 83.85% margin, while also sweeping California's massive 54-electoral-vote prize with a 9.40% margin. Clinton's modest footprint was heavily concentrated in the Northeast and Pacific, scoring decisive wins in Hawaii (+76.50%), Connecticut (+76.80%), Massachusetts (+77.50%), Vermont (+77.60%), and New Jersey (+77.40%), alongside a closer 4.20% plurality win in New York's 33-electoral-vote haul.
What It Means
Petersen's victory was an electoral squeaker built upon a broad, pluralistic national coalition. By securing 279 electoral votes—just 9 votes above the required 270—Petersen capitalized on a fragmented opposition split between the LPS and the Democrats. While Dreemurr dominated the upper Midwest and Pacific coast (including Minnesota, Wisconsin, and California) and Clinton monopolized portions of the Northeast, Petersen swept the South, the Great Plains, and crucial Rust Belt battlegrounds like Michigan and Ohio. Ultimately, Petersen's ability to pull out low-margin plurality victories across states like Arizona, Missouri, and Ohio provided the exact cushion needed to overcome Dreemurr's late-stage surge and clinch the White House.
Results by state
| State | EV | Winner | Share | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AK | 3 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 73.7% | +61.1 |
| AL | 9 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 84.8% | +76.5 |
| AR | 6 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 78.7% | +66.5 |
| AZ | 8 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 48.6% | +1.3 |
| CA | 54 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 52.3% | +9.4 |
| CO | 8 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 52.4% | +9.6 |
| CT | 8 EV | Bill Clinton (DEM) | 85.1% | +76.8 |
| DC | 2 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 48.6% | +10.7 |
| DE | 3 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 79.7% | +68.2 |
| FL | 25 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 87.3% | +80.5 |
| GA | 13 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 84.3% | +75.4 |
| HI | 4 EV | Bill Clinton (DEM) | 86.2% | +76.5 |
| IA | 7 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 87% | +80.3 |
| ID | 4 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 82.2% | +72.1 |
| IL | 22 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 52.2% | +7.8 |
| IN | 12 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 48% | +2.3 |
| KS | 6 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 87.2% | +80.4 |
| KY | 8 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 86.5% | +79.3 |
| LA | 9 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 84.7% | +76.2 |
| MA | 12 EV | Bill Clinton (DEM) | 86.5% | +77.5 |
| MD | 10 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 62.4% | +28.9 |
| ME | 4 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 38.4% | +2.5 |
| ME_CD1 | 0 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 38.4% | +2.5 |
| ME_CD2 | 0 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 38.4% | +2.5 |
| MI | 18 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 39.2% | +7.7 |
| MN | 10 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 89.9% | +83.9 |
| MO | 11 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 47.9% | +1.7 |
| MS | 7 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 85.3% | +77.8 |
| MT | 3 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 74.4% | +54.6 |
| NC | 14 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 84.2% | +75.3 |
| ND | 3 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 83.5% | +74.3 |
| NE | 5 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 55.3% | +14.5 |
| NE_CD1 | 0 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 55.3% | +14.5 |
| NE_CD2 | 0 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 55.3% | +14.5 |
| NE_CD3 | 0 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 55.3% | +14.5 |
| NH | 4 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 34.3% | +0.1 |
| NJ | 15 EV | Bill Clinton (DEM) | 85% | +77.4 |
| NM | 5 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 80.5% | +70.1 |
| NV | 4 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 82.4% | +73 |
| NY | 33 EV | Bill Clinton (DEM) | 50.2% | +4.2 |
| OH | 21 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 35.6% | +2.3 |
| OK | 8 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 87.3% | +81.1 |
| OR | 7 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 52.2% | +9.1 |
| PA | 23 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 50.4% | +4.1 |
| RI | 4 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 43% | +7.3 |
| SC | 8 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 86.7% | +79.4 |
| SD | 3 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 84.9% | +76.6 |
| TN | 11 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 82.8% | +73.1 |
| TX | 32 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 85.6% | +77.5 |
| UT | 5 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 87.2% | +80.5 |
| VA | 13 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 86.3% | +78.5 |
| VT | 3 EV | Bill Clinton (DEM) | 86.6% | +77.6 |
| WA | 11 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 82% | +72.3 |
| WI | 11 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 86.1% | +78.9 |
| WV | 5 EV | Jayden Petersen (FEP) | 49.4% | +2.4 |
| WY | 3 EV | Flowery Dreemurr (LPS) | 50.1% | +14.5 |